We worked on naturalizing streams in order for people to come closer to the water and appreciate these areas as part of the urban playground. This ability is directly linked to the mode of governance. This does not correspond to the classical democratic process. Interestingly , this is in part related to the Confucian tradition, but it also has to do with the age of Internet. Governance is evolving. Dominique Cardon, a French sociologist, has extensively written on democracy in the age of Internet; he argues that stories generate consensus.
In some ways, these kinds of very efficient connections between storytelling, consensus building, and infrastructure development may seem frightening to Westerners. Limin Hee : All city players collect urban data. What is important is who collects, manages, and processes it. The regulatory framework that collectors must abide by, as well as the purpose served by the use of urban data, are also essential elements.
In Singapore, there is a constant need to innovate to solve problems. Thus, we use regulatory sandboxes, which are places where experimentations are conducted over a defined period of time in order to see what works and what does not, before the regulators jump in. The goal of such laboratories is to provide better services for people. We are in a transition period where new players are coming in with new business models and will have to adapt these models to the Singaporean context. Antoine Picon : We must keep in mind that it is not the first time that the private sector has been disruptive.
Early on, in the electricity industry, the first multinational firms caused states a tremendous problem: as major players, they would not obey classical state rules. Currently, very robust negotiations are taking place, in particular with Airbnb.
Singapore is an interesting case, as there is still strong trust in the government. An equilibrium between digital platforms and political powers municipalities and states must be established.
Moreover, the situation is more complicated than it appears. Amongst other things, the notion of privacy is evolving very fast. Take the quantified self: we willingly give more and more information to applications like Fitbit.
To put it briefly, it is not only about the social contract, but also about the people involved in this contract. A new kind of individual has been produced by tech. This major shift results in a need to change the way we think of politics. The digital revolution is not fundamentally a technological revolution: it is a cultural one.
Tech is changing the very way we understand society and communicate with one another, for better and for worse. Social networks are very emblematic of this shift: they have brought new and interesting things, as well as a great deal of terrible things.rernsenterprun.ga
Open Cultural Studies
Yet tech-based discourses are nuanced if not contradicted by reality; tech sometimes only moves or even exacerbates existing problems. What realities lie behind these political promises of a pleasant city?
Digital tools can help us manage resources; however, they consume a lot of energy and emit large amounts of CO 2. To what extent does the storytelling of a city contribute to its governance? This article addresses the contextual, disciplinary and practical challenges encountered in developing an ambitious interactive public art project embedding SMART technology on the coastal fringes of Cardiff, the capital city of Wales UK. It examines the processes and problems involved in delivering a stimulating aesthetic experience in and on a complex site, for a complex audience profile.
It traces, in particular, the dependence of a multi-disciplinary project team on the theoretical and practical effects of affect in their ongoing effort to produce engaging, provocative, socially inclusive interactive public art, in and through human-centred design techniques. Keywords: interactive public art ; site-specificity ; affect ; human-centred design ; social disability ; social inclusion.
Alexander, Christopher. Amabile, Teresa M. Creativity in Context. Colorado: Westview Press, Armstrong, Isobel.
Call for Ideas: "Public for All: Rethinking Shared Space in NYC" | ArchDaily
The Radical Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell, Art Installation. New York: ACM : Backstrom, Lars and Jure Leskovec. Barnes, Colin. Tom Shakespeare. London: Continuum Press, Barthes, Roland. Toronto, Canada: Collins Publishers, Berleant, Arnold. The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, Art and Engagement.
Berlyne, Daniel. Bishop, Claire.
Installation Art: A Critical History. Bordwell, David and Kristen Thompson. Film Art: An Introduction. Bourriaud, Nicholas. Relational Aesthetics. Paris: Les Presses du Reel, Brown, Kathryn. Candy, Linda and Ernest Edmonds. Carlson, Allen. London: Routledge, Carroll, Fiona. Chang, Pai-ling. Bremen: EAD Publishers. Chatfield, Tom. Connor, Stephen.
David Hillman and Ulrike Maude. Cambridge University Press, De Certeau, Michel.
The Practice of Everyday Life.